· I was a little bored with the introduction. There were good sensory details however I felt like the writer was dragging on with the sentences and would’ve been fine leaving some words out. The writer talked about an adventure but didn’t give it all away in the introduction which kept me reading to see what all went on during the adventure.
· Even though the introduction was about the writer when he was little going on a camping trip with his father, he still only talks about a fishing trip however the roles are flipped around now that the writer’s a father taking his son on a camping trip.
· Yes sensory details were present. The writer did a good job informing readers how similar his trip with his son was with his trip with his father when he was his son’s age. I was able to visualize myself going on a camping trip like the writers.
· It would’ve been helpful to include dialogue, but the writer chose not to use any. I think the writer used enough descriptive details about all the activities they did while on the trip that dialogue necessarily didn’t have to be incorporated.
· I myself can relate because camping has always been an interest for me and my family. As for those who aren’t so fond of camping, I think it would be hard for one to connect with. This is where the writer’s good descriptions of the activities performed became helpful for who have never been camping before to get the feel of what fun it can be.
· The writer explains how close of a relationship him and his father had and how it resembles to relationship him and his son now have and how close the camping trip brought them together.
· In the end, the writer talks about how much his son resembles him as a kid with the choices and actions made. I thought the conclusion kind of lacked in completing the story. I was a little confused and left hanging but overall I understood the main point in the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment